Under ArmourThe Under Armour Men's Original Boxerjock 9 in Boxer Brief is made of 90% polyester and 10% elastane and features 4-way stretch construction.Under Armour Men's Original Boxerjock 9 in Boxer Brief
Stay cool, dry and comfortable in the Under Armour Men's Original Boxerjock 9 in Boxer Brief, which features HeatGear® fabric technology and the Moisture Transport System. This boxer brief is made of 90% polyester and 10% elastane and features 4-way stretch construction for mobility and a mesh fly panel for breathability. Anti-odor fabric technology helps prevent the formation of odor-causing microbes.
Features and Benefits
Made of 90% polyester and 10% elastane for a comfortable fit
Machine wash cold with like colors, do not use bleach or fabric softeners; tumble dry low or hang to dry, do not use dryer sheets, do not iron
HeatGear® fabric technology and the Moisture Transport System help keep you cool and dry
Anti-odor fabric technology helps prevent the formation of odor-causing microbes
Articulated mesh fly panel for breathability
4-way stretch construction provides mobility and helps maintain shape
Performance waistband with a UA wordmark provides a snug fit
Flatlock seams allow chafe-free motion
What's in the Box
Under Armour Men's Original Boxerjock 9 in Boxer Brief
Rated 2 out of
Original? Seriously?!I should have listened to the previous reviews. These are very tight on the thighs, which is fine for me but what's not fine is because they're so tight on the thighs you can only pull them up so far and the waist band is garbage! I don't need my butt hanging out the second I lean forward while STANDING!
These are nothing like the originals. Period. I still have all of my originals from 2007 that are JUST NOW starting to fall apart and I just wasted my money on three pair of these to start replacing them.
Date published: 2017-08-27
Rated 3 out of
features are not as good as the originalI agree with most of the reviews about how the product has changed and for the worst. I have many 6" and 9" and have been very pleased with the originals and their wearability. The 9"offered now does not fit near as well and the waist keeps sliding down. The fabric is much thinner. Go back to the original, UA is the only brand that I wear and I want to keep buying UA.
Date published: 2017-08-23
Rated 1 out of
Very Disappointed in the 9" BoxerjockThe 9" Boxerjock of years past used to be very comfortable. This product is uncomfortably tight in the thigh. The waistband is loose and low-cut. This causes the underwear to ride so low on the waist that this product is practically unwearable. I WILL NOT be buying this product again.
Date published: 2017-08-21
Rated 5 out of
Great fitThis is the best fit ever. Super comfortable. I purchased 6" last year that were tight. This year I as skeptical to try Under Amour again but I made the right decision. This 9" Boxer jock series is a perfect fit.
Date published: 2017-07-22
Rated 4 out of
Judy 156 from
Under armourGreat items will buy more in future shipping was super fast
Date published: 2017-07-17
Rated 1 out of
Not the sameI bought 3 pairs of the original 9 inch boxerjock. I LOVED THEM. Soft and fit perfect. Ive ordered 5 more sporadically since then. NONE fit the same. I have no idea what or why UA did this but they ruined a good thing. I wasted my money on trying to order more of what I thought was the same item. Hey UA, it's not the original boxerjock if you decide to change something in it.
Date published: 2017-07-11
Rated 4 out of
Bought a pair recently and bought them again.So...These are way better than the shorter 6" jock. They don't ride up, they keep me cool and no stink. They are a little tight on my thighs and a tiny bit loose at the waist. I like the little bit of "compression" on my thighs. It helps to keep me moving all day. Also, the waist doesn't flap over like some other brands.
I like these and I bought more, so my advice is keep the receipt.
I'm roughly 6' and a solid 260 so hope that helps you guys out there.
Date published: 2017-07-05
Rated 1 out of
Make them in Cambodia again!!I agree with all of the other negative reviews, bring back the originals!! I have been wearing the 9 inch boxer jocks for years now and like everyone else said, the fit is totally different now, too tight in the legs and too loose in the waist. I've narrowed it down to where they were manufactured. All of the one's that were made in Cambodia are the best ones and fit perfectly, the one's made in Bangladesh, are wrong and fit different than the originals! Please correct this before you lose a lot of business!